Nigerians Fantastically Corrupt: Who Taught Them?

The Nigerian-British Union

 

There is an assumed finality, truthiness, and acceptability of opinions the white world expresses about those they deem inferior to themselves. Anything spewed out of their thin lips must be correct since they are psychologically close to deity. This is because they control the narrative and have modified or obscured history in order to fit a whitened planet where Oyinbos have become the reference point for everything that is perfect. From slavery days to the so-called Panama papers, it has been an unending foolery.

Looking at the people present when the Prime Minster of Britain made a rather patronizing statement about Nigeria and one other country being fantastically corrupt; the triumvirate of the imperial, the religious and the political, were represented by the Queen, the Archbishop and the Prime (crime?) Minister. They represent deadly weapons that were unleashed centuries ago to accomplish world domination and institute the concept their supremacy.

The current division of the people of the world into extremes of riches and poverty is the deliberate idea of western powers and their cohorts. The way the system currently works guarantees in perpetuity that there would always be exploitable resources and labor for the satisfaction of corporate and imperial powers whose bastion lies westwards. In fact, in today's world, what seems to be democracy is simply a thinly veiled form of imperial fascism that is championed by the mercantilist class (corporations) for the benefit of unseen and untouchable imperial class. 

The whole gamut of so-called corruption in "developing" nations was caused by the unfortunate but deliberate distortions introduced into each country's socio-political and economic fabric in order to engender the emergence of a local parasitic class that is answerable to the master puppeteers in the corporate halls of western powers. If you look beneath the make-believe news cycle, and dig deep into each country's condition, especially "developing" ones such as in Africa, progressive forces are actively being destroyed for the satisfaction of knaves. 

In the late 50s and early 60s when most African nations became newly "independent", there were great men, and women who were ready to deal a deathblow to colonialism and its vestiges. They eagerly wanted to free African minds and compel real independence. But there were other Africans who benefited immensely from the exploitation of the land and its people during colonial rule. This second group belonged to the powerful local ruling class and their scions. It was from this group that the colonial masters chose most of the first leaders. Since they had been working together with the colonists during official colonialism, it was only natural that they continue to do so afterwards. Progressive minds were never allowed to develop the new nations of Africa after independence.

 A unique example was the personal and political destruction of Patrice Lumumba in Zaire and the subsequent imposition of Mobutu as leader for almost forty years of that nation's history. This means that an entire country's progress was mitigated for nearly four decades by the same powers that love to thumb their noses at backward Africans. The same template was used to stymie the progress of countries in South and Central America, Asia and the Middle East by eliminating statesmen and imposing controllable imps. 

Western leaders should know better than call out other nations as corrupt when they were, and still are, responsible for encouraging corruption worldwide. Nigeria, for example, has been fighting to get monies stolen by past leaders back from the clutches of western banks for more than a couple of decades. These western nations would not tolerate a cabinet minister spending more than a few hundred dollars or pounds over budget, and in fact, some ministers have resigned for not retiring in full, their state sponsored expenses! But these same criminals condone the deposit of billions of dollars and pounds of third world wealth in their banks without question.  They encourage buying fantastic real estate by their puppets without asking how such wealth came about. This is mainly because the transfer of wealth from the third world to the criminal world is used to shore up the economy of the recipient. For example, Abacha's loot has probably generated enough interest in high yielding stocks over the past two decades that has made financial speculators rich.

It is therefore pathetic that the first people we run to when faced with problems are these same criminals who are the basis of most of our problems. This is the reason why they have a good laugh at us when we turn our backs and discuss us as if we are trained zoo animals instead of humans.

Britain and the rest of the western world are hypocritical when they stand afar and point fingers at the vileness they helped in creating. They act as if Africa and other parts of the underdeveloped world are the way they are because of internally generated problems instead of acknowledging their part in the whole mess.

Our educational, military and political systems are direct grafting from the west and that is why these systems would never work for the benefit of Africans. At inception, these systems were not designed to be constructive but at best extractive and at worst destructive. The men in uniform, for example, see anyone but their principal as a piece of kickable matter to be oppressed and destroyed when given the order - just like colonial henchmen. Policemen carry shopping bags for the wives of the rich but would not hesitate to shoot ordinary Nigerians dead at the slightest, or no provocation.

After graduation, most Nigerians are unlikely to be engaged in any meaningful nation-building endeavour, and since western controlled media mostly shape their worldview, they edify whatever is white.  They would do anything to leave what they consider as a backward country and rush towards the lights of Europe, even if it means certain destruction in the Mediterranean Sea. We have even been convinced, or compelled, to stop teaching history in our schools because the only history that matters is white - and what they say about others. But when the history of a people does not matter it is a clear indication that the people themselves do not matter.

Someone said, "…The mother is the first teacher of the child and whatever the mother gives to that child, the child gives to the world."  Britain is the "mother" of Nigeria and other unfortunate countries, and what we have here is that their fantastic corrupting influence has come of age.

Cameron: just zip it; it is your unmitigated corruption and subjugation (from the days of overt slavery to date) of other parts of the world that has made you, the Bishop and the Queen rich and carefree. 

What is termed corruption in Nigeria is actually a desperate cry for help from a people without leadership, whose birthright has been sold and paid for.  Nigerians are content to be treated like animals in a pen because that is the only thing they know. Generally uneducated, they are content to be strung along the tramlines of ethnic and religious perfidy. Unable to fulfill the basic needs of a human being, desperation becomes the order of the day. The only regret in all of this is that our leaders are still children and the Camerons of this world have the whip.